If you order your cheap custom essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Stalin. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Stalin paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Stalin, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Stalin paper at affordable prices! Stalin gained the effective leadership of Russia in 1. Stalins time as leader of Russia was to gain fame for three reasons
· 1. The Five Year Plans
· . Collectivisation
· . The Purges Cheap writing services for Stalin papers But what do we know about Stalin?
• he was born in 187
• he came from a poor background; his father was a cobbler and his mother was a peasant
• his real surname was Djugasvili
• he did well at school and won a scholarship to go to a seminary where priests were trained
• it was at this seminary that Stalin turned to Marxism
• he became a follower of Lenin and went to secret meetings and distributed leaflets
• between 10 and 11 he was arrested 8 times and exiled to Siberia. He escaped 7 times!!
• in prison he adopted the name Stalin which translated as Man of Steel. He felt that it would be good for his image
• he was a very good organiser and the part he played in the November 117 Revolution was probably small. But the skills he gained while helping to organise the Bolshevik Party were to prove invaluable
• after 117, he was rewarded with a number of seemingly unimportant party positions which nobody else wanted. But they gave Stalin a perfect insight into who could be trusted to support him and who could not
• Stalin was seen as dull by the intellectual elite of the Bolshevik Party. They all made a fatal mistake in assuming that he was stupid.
When Stalin became the undisputed leader of Russia in 1, he realised that Russia was far behind the west and that she would have to modernise her economy very quickly if she was to survive. Also a strong economy would lead to a strong military if Russia was going to survive threats from external forces. A modernised Russia would also provide the farmers with the machinery they needed if they were going to modernise their farms - such as tractors.
When the job of party secretary came up in 1, Stalin took it on after all the other leading Bolsheviks had turned it down. they didnt take Stalin seriously (referring to him as the Grey blur, because he was happy to stay out of the limelight), but he was determined that when Lenin died he would become the new leader of Russia
I had pictured him to be a large charismatic figure who could hardly fit through the door. After all, thats the way all his statues looked. I had never seen him before,
He waved at us and that was our signal to let our voices ring out in unison Long live Stalin!
Where did Stalin go wrong? I have always said that Gods function is to
protect people as a group, not as individuals. On the other hand, a leaders responsibility is to protect individuals, not the group
Immediately we are alerted to his explosive temper. The heavy dark pressure of the strokes, the emphatic and excessive use of underlining in several words, the many aggressive angular formations of the lower zone and other places, as well as noticeable variations of pressure all attest to his obsessive temperament and desire to dominate and coerce.
He is not just controlling - in his drive for power he is also forceful and tyrranical. He is moody and temperamental and without feeling for others.
We finish with the third `truth about Stalins personality theutal and cold man, of mediocre intelligence, with no consideration for his fellow humans and who had nothing but contempt for his aids.
How was it possible for even gifted and intelligent people to be deceived?
To begin with, Stalin was a strong and vivid personality. When he wanted to do, Stalin knew how to charm people. He charmed Gorky and Barbusse. In 17, the cruellest year of the purges, he managed to charm that tough and experienced observer, Lion Feuchtwanger.
In the second place, in the minds of the Soviet people, Stalins name was indissoluble linked with Lenins. Stalin knew how popular Lenin was and saw to it that history was rewritten in such a way as to make his own relations with Lenin seem much more friendly than they had been in fact. The rewriting was so thorough that perhaps Stalin himself believed his own version in the end.
There can be no doubt of Stalins love for Lenin. His speech on Lenins death, beginning with the words, In leaving us, Comrade Lenin has bequeathed . . . reads like a poem in prose. He wanted to stand as Lenins heir not only in other peoples eyes, but in his own eyes too. He deceived himself as well as the others. Even Pasternak put the two names side by side
Laughter in the village,
Voice behind the plow,
Lenin and Stalin,
And these verses now...
In reality, however, Stalin distorted Lenins ideas, because to Lenin -- and this was the whole meaning of his work -- communism was to serve man, whereas under Stalin it appeared that man served communism.
Stalins theory that people were the little cogwheels of communism was put into practice and with horrifying results. . . . Russian poets, who had produced some fine works during the war, turned dull again. If a good poem did appear now and then, it was likely to be about the war -- this was simpler to write about.
Poets visited factories and construction sites but wrote more about machines than about the men who made them work. If machines could read, they might have found such poems interesting. Human beings did not.
The size of a printing was not determined by demand but by the poets official standing. As a result bookstores were cluttered up with books of poetry which no one wanted. . . . A simple, touching poem by the young poet Vanshenkin, about a boys first love, caused almost a sensation against this background of industrial-agricultural verse. Vinokurovs first poems, handsomely dishevelled among the general sleekness, were avidly seized upon -- they had human warmth. But the general situation was unchanged. Poetry remained unpopular. The older poets were silent, and when they dideak their silence, it was even worse. The generation of poets that had been spawned by the war and that had raised so many hopes had petered out. Life in peacetime turned out to be more complicated than life at the front. Two of the greatest Russian poets, Zablotsky and Smelyakov, were in concentration camps. The young poet Mandel (Korzhavin) had been deported. I dont know if Mandels name will be remembered in the history of Russian poets but it will certainly be remembered in the history of Russian social thought.
He was the only poet who openly wrote and recited verses against Stalin while Stalin was alive. That he recited them seems to be what saved his life, for the authorities evidently thought him insane. In one poem he wrote of Stalin
There in Moscow, in whirling darkness,
Wrapped in his military coat,
Not understanding Pasternak,
A hard and cruel man stared at the snow.
. . . Now that ten years have gone by [Stalin died in 15], I realize that Stalins greatest crime was not the arrests and the shootings he ordered. His greatest crime was the corruption of the human spirit.
His demeanour is kindly, his manner almost depreciatingly simple. . He greeted me cordially with a smile and with great simplicity, but also with a real dignity. . . . Hisown eye is exceedingly kindly and gentle. A child would like to sit in his lap and a dog would sidle up to him.
Stalin does not seek honours. He loathes pomp. He is averse to public displays. He could have all the nominal regalia in the chest of a great state. But he prefers the background
Stalin . . inspires the Party with his will-power and calm. Individuals in contact with him admire his capacity to listen and his skill in improving on the suggestions and drafts of highly intelligent subordinates
Stalin lives in a modest apartment of three rooms. . . . In his everyday life his tastes remained simple almost to the point of crudeness. . . . Even those who hated him with a desperate hate and blamed him for sadistic cruelties never accused him of excesses in his private life. . Those who measure success by millions of dollars, yachts and mistresses find it hard to understand power relished in austerity. . There was nothing remotely ogre-like in his looks or conduct, nothing theatrical in his manner. A pleasant, earnest, ageing man -- evidently willing to be friendly to the first foreigner whom, he had admitted to his presence in years. Hes a thoroughly likeable person, I remember thinking as we sat there, and thinking it in astonishment.
Lyons asked Stalin Are you a dictator? Stalin smiled, implying that the question was on the preposterous side. No, he said slowly, I am no dictator. Those who use the word do not understand the Soviet system of government and the methods of the Communist Party. No one man or group of men can dictate. Decisions are made by the Party and acted upon by its organs, the Central Committee and the Politburo.
In his speeches and writings Stalin always withdrew into the background, speaking only of communism, the Soviet power and the Party, and stressing that he was really a representative of the idea and the organisation, nothing more. . I never noticed any signs of vainglory in Stalin.
Here the same author expresses surprise at the contrast between the real Stalin and the propaganda picture spread of him During my many years in Moscow I never stopped marvelling at the contrast between the man and the colossal likenesses that had been made of him. That medium-sized, slightly pock-marked Caucasian with a moustache was as far removed as could be from that stereotype of a dictator. But at the same time the propaganda was proclaiming his superhuman abilities. (A. Tuominen ibid., p. 155).
June 16 I must say in all conscience, comrades, that I do not deserve a good half of the flattering things that have been said here about me. I am, it appears, a hero of the October Revolution, the leader of the Communist Party of the Soviet, the leader of the Communist International, a legendary warrior-knight and all the rest of it. This is absurd, comrades, and quite unnecessary exaggeration. It is the sort of thing that is usually said at the graveside of a departed revolutionary. But I have no intention of dying yet. I really was, and still am, one of the pupils of the advanced workers of the Tiflis railway workshops. (J. V. Stalin Works, Volume 8; Moscow; 154; p. 18).
One goes up to the first floor, were white curtains hang over three of the windows. These three windows are Stalins home. In the tiny hall a long military cloak hangs on a peg beneath a cap. In addition to this hall there are three bedrooms and a dining room. The bedrooms are as simply furnished as those of a respectable, second-class hotel. The eldest son, Jasheka, sleeps at night in the dining room, on a divan which is converted into a bed; the younger sleeps in a tiny recess, a sort of alcove opening out of it. . . . Each month he earns the five hundred roubles, which constitute the meagre maximum salary of the officials of the Communist Party (amounting to between £0 and £5 in English money). . . This frank andilliant man is . . . a simple man. . . . He does not employ thirty-two secretaries, Like Mr. Lloyd George; he has only one. . . . Stalin systematically gives credit for all progress made to Lenin, whereas the credit has been in very large measure his own
Of course, many Soviet citizens admired Stalin and expressed this admiration. But clearly, the cult of personality around Stalin was built up mainly by the concealed revisionists, against Stalins wishes. Why? Possible reasons
Firstly, to disguise the fact that the Party and the Communist International were dominated by concealed revisionists and to present the fiction that these were dominated personally by Stalin; thus blame foreaches of socialist legality and for deviations from Marxist-Leninist principles on their part could later be laid on Stalin;
Secondly, to provide a pretext for attacking Stalin at a later date (under the guise of carrying out a programme of democratisation, which was in fact a programme of dismantling socialism and replacing it with state capitalism.
That Stalin himself was not unaware of the fact that the concealed revisionists were the main force behind the cult of personality was reported by the Finnish revisionist Tuominen in 15, who describes how, when he was informed that busts of him had been given prominent places in Moscows leading art gallery, the Tretyakov, Stalin exclaimed Thats downright sabotage! (A. Touminen op. cit.; p. 164).
Please note that this sample paper on Stalin is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Stalin, we are here to assist you. Your cheap research papers on Stalin will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
RSS Feed (xml)