Identity Lost With a New Land

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Identity Lost With a New Land. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Identity Lost With a New Land paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Identity Lost With a New Land, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Identity Lost With a New Land paper at affordable prices! Identity Lost With a New Land

Try to imagine how it would feel to be taken away from your home, having to change from a lifestyle that was familiar to you; a lifestyle that you wanted to lead but could not because those more powerful than you wanted to exploit your land. Native Americans all over the United States and Canada have been forced off of their land for the past two centuries. These struggling people have been denied their freedom to live by being placed in locations where their resources, culture, and identity are being taken away just to appease the people with a higher authority. The constant relocation of the aboriginal people has caused the destruction, to the point of genocide, of their tribes and the people living in those tribes.

In Mean Spirit, the Osage Indian tribe has been relocated to an area where their lifestyles have required major adjustments. The Osage Indians, like many Native Americans, have been relocated to a land that is not very good for living because the ground is full of minerals. When the earth is full of minerals, grass, trees and other green plants do not grow as easily and therefore the land has less wildlife and other sources of food that the Indians would normally rely on. A change in location including an adjustment in resources and temperature of the area such as the change that Osage tribe had to go through has had a great impact on the way of life of their people. It has influenced their lives by changing their lifestyles entirely, and as a result has altered their culture.

One way the Osage Indians have changed as a result of the land is they have become wealthy people from all of the minerals on their new ground. This recent wealth is very new to these people, resulting in unique expenditures that the White American people criticize. Many of the Osage Indians lived in small cabins and they had very expensive cars and or accessories that were completely useless to them. In Mean Spirit, Linda Hogan explains, "It was hard for the newly rich Indians to take their wealth seriously and most were more than happy to buy any and all of the gadgets the scalpers sold from their rickety tables and stands, no matter how much the prices had been marked up" (Hogan 57). In the novel the character Michael Horse is described arriving in his roadster, which is a funny spectacle considering most people view Indians as having simple lives; lives that do not include luxury items. Since accessories such as the ones that the Indians bought with their new wealth are items that most White people desire, the White people started to become jealous and the problems started to occur from there. Once the White Americans noticed the expenditures of the Indians they became envious of their money and they decided they would do anything possible to try to take the land back away from the Indians. In the Osage Indians situation, the White men started to kill the wealthy Indians in attempts to take-over their land.In Mean Spirit, which is based on a true story, the Osage tribe is struck twice with the negative effects of relocation. Not only do the Indians start to lose their culture as a result of the displacement but also they actually start to lose their lives. If that is not the genocide of a complete race then nothing is.

When a group of people such as the Indians, people whose lives revolve around nature and the environment, are forced to change their location, the end consequence is that they are also forced to give-up their lifestyles. Giving up ones lifestyle means that a person is giving up more than just their way of life, they are losing their beliefs, habits, and rituals. The identity of a person thus is completely changed or even lost.

White men in America have power because they have money and they have a set legislature with rules and people who make those rules. Native Americans on the other hand, have an entirely different structured system; they choose to lead their lives in a simple but constructive way. They are constructive for the reason that they know all the skills and tasks it takes to survive, and they require only that to survive. Although the organization of society is completely unlike the one of the White Americans, and contrary to what the White Americans perceive their organization to be, the Indians do demonstrate a sophisticated structure. Their configuration has a lot of positive and at the same time complex niches that construct their lifestyles.

Since the Indians have such simple lives, the White men know that they can take whatever they want away from them simply because they have the authority to do so. The White man resents the fact that some of the Indians that have been relocated have landed on land that hasought them lots of wealth. The reason the White man resents the idea of Native Americans having so much money is in the belief that these Native are very uncivilized people who would not know what to do with all the riches they have received from the oil of their land. The White man from many centuries ago until today has continued to live by the perceptions and beliefs that Benjamin Lincoln put into words in 17,

Civilized and uncivilized people cannot live in the same

territory or even in the same neighborhood. To be allowed

to remain in their homelands, therefore, Indians must

overcome white hostility by becoming civilized. (Wilson 158)

The Indians forced relocation and the murders are all the instances where the White people believe they are superior to the Indians simply because they are more civilized. By thinking they are more civilized they have the idea that they can control what happens to the less civilized people.

In the minds of the White people, Indians can easily overcome the prejudice and discrimination they face by becoming more civilized, meaning they need to live life more like the White Americans do. Changing the entire lifestyle of an individual concludes in the metamorphosis of a persons identity. The loss or complete change of identity has an outcome of a loss of culture and heritage. It is extremely difficult to nearly impossible to keep a persons heritage alive when their culture requires a certain lifestyle. The culture of Native Americans is a perfect example of how a change of lifestyle changes the entire culture of the people. Part of the tradition of the aboriginal people is going hunting, fishing, and doing daily tasks that require one to survive the day. When the daily chores are changed the ways of the Indian ancestors heritage begin to get lost in the tradition. One Indian from the Sayisi Dene Tribe recalls how most of her past was being forgotten because of their relocation. Their heritage was being changed because her people did not and could not hunt and fish like they used to. This girl was able to witness the entire transformation of her culture and people because she was only a child when her tribe was forced to relocate. When reflecting back on the past, this girl is able to reflect the following,

The pain from the relocation stays with us, no matter how hard we try to go forward. The damage is something we may never repair �as is evident in my community today. I know that before the relocation, my parents were proud and dignified, that they were skilled people like all the Sayisi Dene. When the government forced this relocation on us, our survival skills fell apart. (Bussidor, Reinart 5)

Partly why all the Sayisi Dene was having so much trouble retaining their culture was because the location they were displaced to was more North and much colder. As a result these people could not hunt and harvest because the majority of the time the land was frozen.

To add to the problems faced, the agreements the Canadian and United States governments made concerning relocation were usually made to sound appealing and then they wereoken. For example, with Sayisi Dene the Canadian government told them that they were going to have log cabins built for them on arrival, however, this was not the case (Bussidor, Reinart 7). When the Sayisi Dene was dropped off at the relocation in Northern Manitoba they spent weeks without any shelter or warm clothing. Mary Yassie, a member of the Sayisi Dene describes,

As the winter set in we had no other way but to live in a canvas tent for the whole winter. My dad eventually built a shack with scrap lumber across the Churchill river where some people were living. The wildlife and firewood in the area could not sustain the community. Without caribou the people had no winter clothing or shelter. They couldnt feed their dogs so they couldnt go trapping. (Bussidor, Reinart, 4)

The Canadian government assured the Indian people everything was going to be all right with their relocation but in fact nothing was okay. Most of the promises the government made were not followed through, so the Sayisi Dene was put in a very difficult situation.

The relocation of Native Americans that is taking place in both Canada and the United States has had serious effects on the aboriginal people. While both countries seem to be acceptant of various races it has not stopped them from committing the genocide of Indians. The White people are accepting of the Indians as long as they conform to his society. Since the entire Indian races culture has everything to do with nature and is contrary to the White mans culture, the White man has been trying to get rid of them. The White men do not like the idea of people having their own beliefs and views on life because they feel the life they lead is the life that everyone should lead. This life is a life that is surrounded with the quest for money and the evolution of society. Since Native Americans do not lead this kind of life that means they were incapable of development (Wilson 1).

Relocation is a serious issue facing Aboriginals in North America. These people are being denied their race and identity so that the White man can accumulate wealth. Genocide is being committed towards the Indians by the White man simply because the governments of both Canada and the United States are wanting to earn more profit. It almost seems as if both countries think it is okay to obliterate and destroy an entire race. Knowing how multi-cultural and ethnically diverse these two countries are, it would almost be inevitable that something like the genocide of Indians would be put to a stop long ago, but unfortunately it is still a serious issue that not enough people are concerned about.

Please note that this sample paper on Identity Lost With a New Land is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Identity Lost With a New Land, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Identity Lost With a New Land will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

bla

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on bla. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality bla paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in bla, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your bla paper at affordable prices! Forward into battle

Bushs call for the US to go to war leaves Blair facing the moment he hoped would never come

Jackie Ashley

Thursday January 0, 00

College papers on bla The Guardian

This was not a calm assessment of the dangers posed by Iraq; this was a commander ordering his troops into battle. After George Bushs second state of the union address, there can be no doubt that America is set on war. Here in London, Jack Straw and Tony Blair are still talking about Saddam having a last chance to persuade the inspectors, and to disarm. Over there in Washington, time has run out.

So is the Blair strategy already in ruins? Is there any chance of Bush being persuaded to delay much beyond next weeks UN session in which Colin Powell will unveil the alleged links between Saddam and al-Qaida? Will the prime minister be able toing the French and Germans alongside? When he sets off for Camp David later today, is it to discuss the situation, and advise, and urge, and warn - or simply to get his orders?

One thing is for sure. Whatever happens in the Gulf itself, the gulf of understanding between Europe and America has rarely looked wider. To European ears, much of what Bush says sounds archaic. There are the constant references to good and evil. Theres the biblical language (days of promise and days of reckoning). Old Europe, as Donald Rumsfeld calls us, doesnt take religion too seriously these days Bushs Washington is fundamentalist.

Then there is the calm, ponderous pomposity of the address to Congress itself Distinguished citizens and fellow citizens, every year by law and by custom we meet here to consider the state of the union. America has an instinctive deference to its political leader we abandoned long ago. This was as if Tony Blair addressed both houses of parliament, with Margaret Thatcher, Iain Duncan Smith, Neil Kinnock, the top militaryass, and even Dennis Skinner in the audience, all of them leaping up loyally to applaud him, perhaps 0 or 40 times in one speech - and with TV cutaway shots of Clare Short looking tearful and adoring. These are Potomac customs. They wouldnt happen by the Thames.

We know, of course, that the pomp of the state of the union address barely hides another reality an economically divided, unequal and uncertain country, with a substantial anti-war movement of its own, and whose citizens remain sceptical about their presidents wider strategies. Despite warm words about helping the poor with a system of mentors, and a big chunk of money to fund research into hydrogen cars to help the environment, his old conservatism shone through, with calls for an end to abortion. When he spoke ofinging forward his massive tax cuts, it was notable that only half of Congress rose to applaud stone-faced Democrats sat that one out.

With stock values plunging and a shiver of fear running through the markets, we know too that an early war is supposed to be some kind of economic solution. However bizarre it sounds, the US commentator who said that attacking Iraq was Bushs version of an economic stimulus had a point. Bushs moralistic language hid commercial calculation. The markets would like a short, sharp end to the uncertainty. They may not get it however well the speech went down on the night, if the war that follows produces large numbers of American casualties, and a wider conflagration, Bush will be in deep trouble.

From aitish point of view, all that is rather beside the point, though, compared to theute fact of Bush virtually declaring war. The single most significant sentence in his address was not the grand rhetoric about freedom and compassion but the stark assertion that the course of this nation does not depend upon the decisions of others. That was a direct slap in the face for United Nations prevarication and was instantly understood as such by his audience. It produced wild cheering. For Bush, the world community at the UN is interesting; but not very interesting; and certainly not essential.

He is the only person in the world who can afford to think this way. He has the muscle that no one else comes near to possessing. His menaces and his stare are easily mocked, but they are also impressively scary. I would not have liked to have been an Iraqi general watching that speech. We caricature todays America as a flabby, divided and sentimental empire, led by an idiot; but it is also, at moments, the warlike republic of old, with a self-certainty no other country has known for generations. Today the UN is the flag and theory of the world order but America, like its Coke, is the real thing.

So where does that leave Tony Blair? Presumably, facing the moment he hoped would never come to back American action even without UN support - or not? His Texan chum could not have been clearer We will consult, but let there be no misunderstanding - if Saddam Hussein fails to disarm, we will lead a coalition to disarm him. UN, or no UN, the Americans are going in.

Its hard to believe that Blair has any purchase left at all. Colin Powell, after all, who was always meant to be the voice of moderation in the administration, and Blairs key ally there, has defected to the hawks. He is the one going to the UN with this new dossier of evidence, the last dove now onside for war. The Americans, clearly, dont need Hans Blix to find a smoking gun they have produced their own, in the form of Colin Powell and his new intelligence.

Will it be enough to persuade sceptical countries like Germany and France, Russia and China? Possibly, but by no means certainly. The link between Iraq and al-Qaida sounds tenuous at the most - and raises the question why, if there is a link, has more not been made of it before? The likeliest thing is that Blair will be forced to make the best of a bad job, and help corral those countries, such as Spain, who will join in the motley coalition of the willing - or rather the coalition of the oh, hell, if hes going to do it anyway, wed better shuffle along in the background in case the Yanks get stroppy later. Blair will strain every sinew to get a new UN resolution, but in the end, will go with Bush because by now he feels he has no choice.

Watching George Bushs speech, you sense that, for him, attacking Iraq is not such a great gamble. He has the greatest military power the world has ever seen, and a nation still traumatised by the attacks of September 11 behind him. Now even Wall Street is urging him on.

For Tony Blair its very different.itain has not yet been attacked in the same way; indeed many people here believe attacking Iraq makes terrorism at home more likely, not less. The anti-war chorus is growing ever louder, both outside and inside the Commons, where the prime ministers insistence yesterday thatitish troops would only be committed to war by our government, our House of Commons, our country was met with roars of disbelief.

Blair is generally thought to be a good speaker - able to swing or at least subdue an angry audience, as he has so often at Labour conferences. On the evidence of Tuesday night, he is not as good as Bush. Yet if he is going to rally this uncertain, sceptical country behind the coming war, hell have to make the state of the union address look like the work of a bumbling beginner. It seems about as likely as Maggie Thatcher cheering him, and Clare Short weeping tears of adoration.

No beginning or end to war

Günter Grass

Wednesday January , 00

The Guardian

War is looming. Once again war looms. Or is war only being threatened so as to stop war coming? Does the limiting word only mean that this is just a mock threat, this staged build-up of US anditish troops and ships on the Arabian peninsula and in the Red sea, with its supply of pictures to the media of overwhelming military might? As soon as one of the worlds two dozen dictators has crumbled into exile or preferably is dead, will this all turn out to be a show of force whichought peace and can vanish away again?

Hardly. This looming war is a wanted war. It is already going on in the heads of the planners, in the worlds stock exchanges, and in what seem to be forward-dated TV programmes. The enemy target is in the sights. He has been named and - along with other enemies on the stocks who will be targeted and named next - he fits the bill for those who want to conjure a danger so grim that it undermines careful reflection.

We know how people create enemies where none exists. We know, and have plenty of pictures to illustrate it, what happens in war when the target is not quite hit. We are familiar with the words for damage and casualties which we are told to accept as inevitable. We are used to the relatively small number of its own dead that the worlds number one ruling power has to count and mourn while the mass of enemy dead, including women and children, go uncounted and are not worth mourning.

So now we wait for the new war and the old repetitions. This time new missile systems will be even more accurate. We can be confident about the choice of pictures from this looming war. The flow of images will be sanitised of every detail of horror. Familiar TV channels will be there to give us a new instalment of war as soap opera, interrupted only by ads for consumers who are living happily in peace.

The only issue for discussion is whether people approach this coming, already happening war as loudmouthed or half-hearted allies, or the sort who may only make a small contribution on the sidelines like the Germans, whose time for making war is over by now, or should be.

Who is the target of this war which is only being threatened? A fearful dictator. But Saddam Hussein, like other dictators, was once aother-in-arms to the democratic world power and its allies. On their behalf, and heavily armed by the west, he waged war for eight years against his neighbour Iran, because at that time the dictator who ruled there was enemy number one.

But, the argument goes on, Saddam Hussein is in possession of of weapons of mass destruction (which has not yet been proved). We are also promised that after this dictator is defeated democracy will be installed in Iraq. But this dictators neighbours, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, which are western allies and serve as launchpads for invading Iraq, are also dictatorships. Are they the next targets for wars toing democracy?

I know these are idle questions. The world powers arrogance has an answer for all of them. But everyone knows or assumes that it is all about oil. To be accurate, that its all about oil again. The spectre of hypocrisy which the last remaining superpower and its chorus of allies use to cover their true interests has become so threadbare that the drive for dominance shows right through. It stands there in its huis, unashamed and dangerous to the rest of the world. The current US president is the perfect expression of this common danger we face.

I dont know if the United Nations will be resolute enough to resist the USs clenched drive for power. My experience tells me this wanted war will be followed by other wars with the same drive behind them. I hope my countrys citizens and government will give convincing proof that we Germans have learned the lesson of the wars we have caused and will say no to the oncoming madness, called war.

What should I do if in fretful sleep

the ghosts of the slaughtered were to appear,

bloody, pale, and wan, and weep

in front of me, what should I do?

Thats the question the 18th century writer, Matthias Claudius asks in his poem, Warsong. Looking back on our wars and the people we have slaughtered, this is the question we have still not answered completely.

That distant, looming war which is already under way and which never stops, poses his same question yet again.

Alas, it is war, and I dont wish to carry the guilt for it.

• Günter Grass won the Nobel prize for literature in 1. His new novel, Crabwalk, will be published by Faber in April.

Chirac and Schröder unite to press for peace

Europe Nato ambassadors delay agreeing US request for war help

John Hooper in Berlin, Ian Black inussels and Jon Henley in Paris

Thursday January , 00

The Guardian

Anglo-American efforts to build international support for a war on Iraq were facing new difficulties last night after France and Germany declared they were forming a united front to press for a peaceful solution.

As they were doing so, the practical implications of European reluctance were made starkly clear at Nato headquarters inussels where alliance ambassadors were unable to approve a US request for assistance in the event of war.

Though important differences remain between the stances of France and Germany, comments yesterday by President Chirac and Chancellor Schröder on the 40th anniversary of their bilateral treaty aligned their policies on Iraq more closely than before.

Mr Schröder told a joint press conference in Paris We are both completely agreed on harmonising our positions as closely as possible so as to find a peaceful solution to the Iraqi crisis. Mr Chirac said their joint approach was based on the two principles that the security council is the only body qualified to decide on military intervention, and secondly that war is always an admission of failure and the worst possible solution. Everything possible should be done to avoid it.

Before setting off for Paris, the chancellor had appeared to rule out a German yes to war in the United Nations. At a state election rally on Tuesday evening he told voters Do not expect that Germany will agree to a resolution that legitimises war. Do not reckon with it.

Taken together with yesterdays claims of a common vision, his warning raised the possibility of a formidable anti-war bloc in the security council, with one member - Germany - holding the chair from Feuary 1 and the other - France - able to block any second resolution in favour of war. On Monday, the French foreign minister, Dominique de Villepin, hinted that Paris might use the veto it wields as a permanent member of the 15-strong council.

The US secretary of state, Colin Powell, displayed irritation at Frances public threat. He said he had telephoned Mr de Villepin, and said the two men had a candid and honest and forthright conversation. According to the Boston Globe, Mr Powell dismissed Frances opposition as a blip.

Yesterday Mr Chirac declined to answer a question on whether France would vote the same way as Germany, which is currently one of the councils 10 rotating members.

Last week Washington made a formal request for help from Nato, including anti-missile protection for Turkey, an alliance member which is likely to be a key staging post for American forces. Requests were also made for the use of Natos Awacs surveillance planes, planning, ports, bases, airspace, refuelling facilities, and possible peacekeeping assistance in a post-war Iraq.

But ambassadors failed to reach agreement on providing such support. Officials said the decision was deemed premature while hopes of a peaceful solution remained.

Germany, now leading European opposition to war, was a key doubter after Berlin signalled that even this limited US shopping list was too sensitive politically. France is taking the same line.

Both France and Germany have called for more time to be given to the UNs arms inspectors. But whereas Mr Schröder has ruled out any military role for Germanys troops, the French have been careful to give themselves more flexibility.

Earlier this month, Mr Chirac was not even ruling French military intervention if war was felt to be necessary for the disarming of Saddam Husseins regime. But evidence has yet to emerge of the kind that would allow him to carry the nation with him.

Please note that this sample paper on bla is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on bla, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on bla will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

A Reporter in Nam

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on A Reporter in Nam. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality A Reporter in Nam paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in A Reporter in Nam, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your A Reporter in Nam paper at affordable prices! Herrs view of the Vietnam war is diffucult to interpret because at times he describes it as a hell withutal accounts of mutilation and death. At other times, he seeks solice in the exhileration that comes from the fear.

He was there "to cover the war and the war covered me", is easiest way to describe what he encountered. Herr was nieve at when he first got to Saigon. He writes of the moring before he was dropped off on the front lines, he had purchased fatigues and dressed up in them, stood in front of his mirror "making faces and moves Id never make again". He, and probably most men entering this war thought it would be like old war movies or cowboys and indians. Much later, he ends up buring this set of fatigues and with them, any misconceptions he had that a person could come out of this war the same as they went into it. Herr, personally believed that he didnt understand what he was about to see until much later, even after he had been back in the United States. He was just responding to whatever stimuli he encountered moment by moment.

When describing the origins of the war itself, it is clear that Herr felt it should have never become and international war. In early 16 and 16, he saw it as a struggle amoung the already corrupt of Vietnam vieing for stature within the country. There was the occassional American adventurers or CIA, fighting on their own terms, he labelled as Irregulars, "woring in remote places under little direct authority, acting out their own fantasies with more freedom than most men ever know." (This may be a forshadowing of type of individuals who actually were able to survive the war). It began with individuals and groups who were fighting for themselves, whether it was for money, power or even personal satisfaction. It turned into a war where no one was really sure who they were fighting or what they were fighting for. "Their adventure became our war, then a war bogged down in time, so much time, so badly accounted for that it finally became entrenched as an institution because there had never been room made for it to go anywhere else."

In a way, it had started out as a game, the sort of game that men played when they were boys, with unspoken rules, winners and losers. "One night I woke up and heard the sounds of a firefight going on kilometers away, a skirmish outside our perimeter; muffled by distance to sound like the noises we made playing guns as children, kssshh kssshh; we knew it was more authentic than bang bang, it enriched the game and this game was the same, only way out of hand at last, too rich for all but a few serious players." But, he believed in some peoples minds it was still a game because that was the only way the could cope with the war. The tactics used to fight the Vietnam war were, basically, guerilla warfare. It was diffucult to tell the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army from the South Vietnamese. These tactics had not been used in other wars of this magnitude and were unexpected, forcing soldiers, at times, to fire upon anyone they saw.

This was also a war fought by very young men, not just the grunts, but even their commanding officers were sometimes in their early twenties, never having expirienced anything even close to war.

According to Herr, the conditions the soldiers were living in made it a stuggle to survive at times, even without being shot at constantly. "Night sweats, harsh functions of consciousness, drifting in and out of your head, pinned to a canvas cot somewhere. Looking up at a strange ceiling or out through a tent flap of a combabt zone. Or dozing and waking under mosquito netting in a mess of slick sweat, gagging for air that wasnt percent moisture, one cleaneath to dry-slvice your anxiety and backwater smell of your own body….There were spots in the jungle where you had to have a cigarette going all the time, wether you smoked it or not, just to keep the mosquitos from swarming in your mouth. War under water, swamp fever and instand weight control, malarias that could burn you out and cave you in, put you inot twenty-three hours of sleep a day without giving you a minute of rest…." Herr makes it clear that these men were dealing with a nightmarish situation with conditions that they were not accostom to fighting armies that lived in these conditions all their lives. The Americans had a definate disadvantage from the beginning.

When in the field, Herr, spent much of his time surrounded by grunts. They were the soldiers who were lower than officers, usaully the ones who wanted to be there the least. Besides writing about what he actually saw, a great deal of his writing was derived from the stories that they told. It seemed as though he had both distain and affection for the grunts. At times he was horrified by the nochelant way they could describe killing Vietnamese, or even the enthusiasm in which they depicted some of the battles they had lived through. Herr, was however, able to accept the fact that it wasnt entirely their fault, they had to cope any way possible. It was the grunts who looked out for Herr and many of the other correspondants of the war. He pointed out how in Hue, they had tried to give him their helmets and flak jackets because he didnt have his own. How, in Khe Sanh, two marines that he had just met went out to find him a stretcher to sleep on, while so many of them were sleeping on the floor. "If you tore your fatigues on the wire or trying to crawl for cover, youd have new, or at least fresh ones within minutes and never know where they came from. They always took care of you." This demonstrates that Herr appriciated the situation that they were in. They were humans, forced to live in an inhumane situation. For every terrible act they carried out, some also showed compassion.

Herr does not always show the same affinity towards soldoers of higher ranking as he does for the grunts. Especially a particular colonel he met at the rex BOQ in Siagon who was lecturing his views about the differences between Vietnamese and Americans. The colonel explained " We are a nation of meat-eating hunters, while the other guy just ate rice and a few grungy fish heads. We are going to club him to death with our meat." He believes that this is the attitude that kept the United States in the war, colonels and generals who were out of touch with the reality of the situation. Later, however, he interviews the commander of the 6th Marine regiment, Colonel david Lownds in Khe Sahn. This particular colonel was often depicted as incoherent to the tragedy of the war by many correspondants. He was not fond of reporters because they failed to report the whole story. During Herrs interview with him, he was able to see that this was a man who would not sent his troops anywhere that he was not willing to go himself. He had a compassionate side, but had to act a certain way because, he, in a way, was a grunt himself. He had to instill confidence and do the undesireable work that his superiors were not willing to do themselves.

Most soldiers ranking above a captain disliked the press. Herr accepted this and seemed to carry a small bit of embarressment over his status in the war. Correspondants were able to come and go as they pleased. They were getting paided to follow the sorrow of others."It was creepy being despised in such casual offhanded ways. And there were plenty of people who believed, finally, that we were nothing more than glorified war profiteers. And perhaps we were, those of us who didnt get wounded or otherwise fucked-up."

Throughout the book, Herr shares soldiers, as well as correspondants fears of being injured or killed. Many men became very superstitious during the Vietnam war because it they say so many people die. He described how men carried locks of hair, photos, one marine even saved an oatmeal cookie he had been sent. These details represent the hoplessness that many of the soldiers felt toeard their situations. They believed that it would take something more than their own skills to keep them alive. Thye were unable to protect themselves and turned to anything else they could think of. There were also established preferences of ways to be injured or killed. "Some feared head wounds, some dreaded chest wounds or stomach wounds, everyone feared the wound of wounds, the Wound….You could die in a sudden bloodburing crunch as your chopper hit the ground like dead weight, you could fly apart ot that your pieces would never be gathered, you could die in the last stages of malaria…" Injury or death was inevitable.

One point, in particular, that Herr made clear was that no one left the war unchanged. Whether, they were soldiers, correspondants or even the Vietnamese themselves. He depicts one situation where a ten year old Vietnamese boy approaches himself and some marines. The boy was walking oddly and then lunges at them tearing at their eyes and cloths. It was clear that the boy had gone crazy, something that had occurred to none of them before. He tells of many people who were unable to leave the war and ended up staying in Vietnam. He, himself, would wake up thinking that there were dead marines that needed to be covered when he was at home in the US.

Please note that this sample paper on A Reporter in Nam is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on A Reporter in Nam, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on A Reporter in Nam will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

holocaust

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on holocaust. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality holocaust paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in holocaust, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your holocaust paper at affordable prices!

People of Holocaust

" A sure way to lift oneself up is by helping to lift someone else up" by Booker T. Washington. This quote means in order to keep your own faith and hope up you have to help another person keep their faith and hope up through bad times. This quote is true because by knowing that you are helping someone some how, you feel better about your self. There are many people during holocaust who showed this quote to be true, they endangered themselves in order to help some one and show them some hope through bad times.

Yitzhak Katzenelson (1886-144)Professional writers help on holocaust essays This Heew/Yiddish poet and playwright contributed to underground press and to the cultural life of the German nation and indicted apathetic western Christian civilization.

In April 144 Yitzhak Katzenelson and his son Zivi were sent from the vittel transit camp to Auschwitz Birkenau, where they were killed. Left behind were his vittel diary and the 15- canto elegy. The Song of the Murdered Jewish People.

After few days of the outeak of the war Yitzhak went in to hiding, and a commander of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising asked him to teach Jewish kids. This event inspired him to teach and write again andought him out of his depression. "Five-person squads would gather in shadowy hiding places and he would teach them Bible, Jewish history, literature, poetry, fables and songs. At the same time he imparted to his students a clear view of the present, courage and dedication."( Biography of Yitzhak Katzenelson). Also Yitzhak Katzenelson helped and encouraged Jewish Fighting Organization (JFO), which was an organization formed to fight the Nazis. He did not join it because he was to old, but his son Zivi was part of it. As the fighting began Yitzhak deported from the fighters and left them with his last words of encouragement and hopefulness.

"As we prepare ourselves with weapons in our hands, we will be happy to meet the enemy and die. Our war, with weapons in our hands, will be a source of nourishment for future generations. Let us take ourethren in the Land of Israel as our example. They were not weak-hearted in times of danger, and the few faced the many, and through their death educated generations of Jews. The Germans are killing millions of Jews, but they will not defeat us. The Jewish people will live on."( Yitzhak Katzenelson)

Yitzhak Katzenelson is a perfect example of proving the quote to be true. While being in depression because of the oppression of the Jews, he was asked to educate Jewish communities in the Ghetto. Seeing what a difference he made in the children by showing them spiritual resistance and how he gave them hope, changed his self- perception. He was not depressed any more, he felt very powerful and became very helpful. So just like the quote states to have hope, you have to help other people obtain hope. Yitzhak Katzenelson gave JFO encouragement and faith to fight and kill the Nazis,, which gave him hope and reason to live. He also encouraged the Jewish community in the ghetto to not give up their faith by teaching them the bible and Jewish literature, which encouraged him to be spiritually resistant.

Adam Czerniakow (1880- 14)

This engineer was the first head of the Nazis appointed Jewish council in the Warsaw ghetto. Czerniakow helped obtain food, encouraged secret classes and did much to relieve the general suffering of his fellow Jews. On July ,14 Czerniakow committed suicide, rather than comply with Nazi orders to sign the second mass deportation. Order the transport to Treblinka continued unhalted until October. Taking a toll of 10,000 innocent lives.

Czerniakow felt the concept of Universe of Obligation, he thought by being a chairman of the Warsaw Ghetto he can help his own kind of people. "Czerniakow endeavored to prevent the direct intervention of the German authorities, and sought to organize the internal affairs of the Jews with a minimum of outside involvement. This approach made possible clandestine economic activity, the illegal smuggling of food, and so on. In his activity he devoted special attention to, and reached some positive results in building of an educational system to care for children in the ghetto"(Encyclopedia of the Holocaust). Knowing the conditions of the Ghetto motivated him to help the Jews. People in the ghetto were unsure about him, but the people who worked with him praised him and his qualities.

Adam relates to this quote because he gave some hope to the people in the Ghetto by distributing food and trieng to help the Jews as much as possible, that gave him a reason to be proud of himself and not feel like a conspirator. When he realized he cant help the Jews any more, he had no reason to live. There was no way he was going to turn over thousands of people to the Nazis. So he saw there was no more hope for those people and nothing will help them stay alive at that point of time, he lost all his faith in himself. The concept Universe of Obligation made him decide if his own people going to die, he is going to die with them by committing suicide.

Michael Ber Weissmandel (10- 150)

A leader of the Jewish underground in Slovakia . This orthodox rabbi helped end transports to Poland in 14. He engaged in many efforts to rescue Jews in Slovakia, but failed in his attempts to halt all deportations from Western Europe and the Balkans. Rabbi Weissmandel also passed on eyewitness testimony in 144 from four Jews who had fled Auschwitz and he unsuccessfully demanded that the allies bomb Birkenau and the railway lines leading to it from Hungary. Rabbi Weissmandel jumped from a train bound for Auschwitz and reached safety in Switzerland near the war end.

Rabbi risked his life over and over to help Jewish people. He was a hero by trieng to stop deportations of Jews and tried to destroy the road to death. He is related to the quote because he stood up to the Nazis as much as he could, he held his pride up to give hope to other people. He showed that they should not give up on faith, because there are people who are willing to fight for freedom of religion and just freedom to be human. He helped a lot of people from being transported to Poland , which shows him risking his life to help people that he does not know personally but feels the obligation because they were all part of human kind. He kept on trieng to help Jews in different ways, but even though some of the things were unsuccessful he did not give up. He saw that by helping people he is making a difference in peoples lives by giving them hope and thats what kept him encouraged to keep on going and not just be a bystander.

Janusz Korczak (1878- 14)

Henryk Goldszmit known by the Pseudonym Janusz was a progressive educator, physician and social worker who directed a Jewish orphanage in Warsaw along with educator Stefania Wilczynska.

Janusz Korczak wrote numerous pioneering books in pedagogy and children literature. Many of which were later translated into several languages. Janusz Korczak rescued many youngsters after the Nazi invasion of Poland and when the orphanages entire population was deported to Treblinka in August 14 insisted on accompanying his charges.

Viewing the orderly -mile procession of 00 well dressed children led by Korczak to the train , a witness told historian Emmanuel Ringelblum this was not a march to the railway cars ; this was an orphanage wordless protest against the murders!

Janusz was a hero. He loved children and he took them in his orphanage when their parents could not provide for them or were dead. When he was told that if he turns over all the children in his orphanage to the Nazis , his life will be spared. Instead of giving the kids away , he decided to die with them. The children symbolized his happiness and hope for the better. If he couldnt save their lives, he would not be able to live with himself. So while being on the train that is leading to the concentration camps, he lied to the children to give them some hope. He told them they are going to a better place and knowing that the children were not emotionally in pain for some period of time, gave himaveness to die with pride. He showed he is not part of this cruel inhumanity and wont join it, even to save his life.

I believe

I believe in Sun even when

it is not shinning

I believe in love when

feeling it not

I believe in god even

when he is silent

Inscriptions on the walls of a cellar in cologne Germany where Jews hid from Nazis

This poem relates to the quote because it talks about a person who has hope and spiritual resistance, even though nothing good is happening. This poem will give hope and power to believe in god again. I think knowing that if someone reads this, it will inspire them to hold on to whatever they have left emotionally. Not give up on life and humankind. It makes a person feel better and happier knowing that their is someone who cares and loves them, even though they been dehumanized to a point of having no emotions left.

During Holocaust there were perpetrators, conspirators, heroes and bystanders. There were people who just stood by and watched innocent people being slaughtered and dehumanized. Some people didnt care and some were only afraid for their lives and wanted to save themselves. Karczak, Czerniakow, Katzenelson and Rabbi Weissmandel were some of the heroes from Holocaust. They knew the only way to be happy with themselves is to make someone else happy. To have spiritual resistance and physical resistance they have to show other people how to fight physically and emotionally against Nazis. Since the beginning of the war all of them tried to help in the best way they could, and kept on helping till the last minutes. If there would be more heroes during that time , this event would not go as far as it did. If people were willing to help other people or even other countries helping people in need, everyone would be at peace. Feeling good about your self and having faith in other people can only come from knowing that you helped someone and made a difference in their life andought faith to them by letting them know there are good people in the world

Please note that this sample paper on holocaust is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on holocaust, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on holocaust will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Explain what globalization is and how it affects the state

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Explain what globalization is and how it affects the state. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Explain what globalization is and how it affects the state paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Explain what globalization is and how it affects the state, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Explain what globalization is and how it affects the state paper at affordable prices! According to the text globalization is the integration of states through increasing contact, communication and trade to create a holistic, single global system in which the process of change increasingly binds people together in a common fate.

Propelled forward by increasingly new technological advances, globalization has made the world extremely small allowing people to communicate across time zones. Globalization has alsoought about diminished national borders and the fusing of individual national markets, all of which have aided international growth and development.

The effects of globalization have had the most effect in four areas finance, production, labor and trade. Globalization of finance is defined by the text as the increasing transnationalization of financial markets. Central to this idea of global finance is the concept of a consolidated financial system that is not centered on or in any one state. This stateless financial system has made governmental regulations and restrictions limited, if not near impossible. Increasing technological advances in this area include electronic cash, which makes monetary transaction semi instantaneous.

Globalization in production has lead to a growth in the multinational corporations and partnerships. American companies like for Ford Motor Company have begun to decentralize management, choosing instead to disperse control throughout their world offices. This move allows for less duplication in product and production, creating in essence world products. Also by creating offices and factories overseas these MNC have been able to build strategic alliances, which allow them to reduce production cost and compete competitively with other companies. One downside to global production is a globalization in the labor market. With many companies moving their manufacturing plants overseas where labor wages are lower, globalization in the labor market has lead to insecurity in the workplace. Globalization has exposed a deep fault line between groups who have the skills and mobility to flourish in global markets and those who either do not have these advantages or perceive the expansion of unregulated markets as inimical to social stability. (Rodrik, 17) In a global labor market there are clear winners and losers, for example in the United States unemployment rates are very low but worker wages have also fallen over the past decade.Professional writers help on Explain what globalization is and how it affects the state essays The last category of globalization is trade. Increased speed in communication and speed linking world market places is the primary driving force behind trade globalization. With the reduction of tariff rates, trade barriers and regulations, global trade has changed the way the world consume products and services.

So, does globalization aid or hinder states; the answer to this relies in which side of the argument you believe. Pro globalization supporters believe that globalization promotes the free exchange of information, leads to a greater understanding of other cultures and allow democracy to overcome autocracy. They point to the many social advances made possible by the creation of a global village. For example, if a disaster occurs in one part of the world because of the globalization in media outlets those images can be beamed around the world in a matter of minutes; subsequently other countries are able to send help within a matter of hours and/or days.

Anti-globalization supporters argue that the gains made through globalization have come at the expense of underdeveloped countries. They also argue that the national cultures and identities of underdeveloped countries are in danger because of what has been termed Americanation. Americanation is the spread of American ideas, values and culture throughout other countries. The spread of satellite television, movies, clothing, international media and increased levels of international travel are all symptoms of Americas desire to spread its germ.

Please note that this sample paper on Explain what globalization is and how it affects the state is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Explain what globalization is and how it affects the state, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Explain what globalization is and how it affects the state will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

gdfgsdg

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on gdfgsdg. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality gdfgsdg paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in gdfgsdg, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your gdfgsdg paper at affordable prices! To be or to be, that is the question. For it better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all. Romeo, Romeo, oh where for art thou Romeo. Deny thy mother and decieve thy father and come away with me now. Twille, Twille, little star. How I wonder what you are. Up above the world so high, like a diamond in the sky. Twikle, Twikle little star. How I wonder what you are. Now I lay me down to sleep. I pray the Lord my soul to keep. If I should die before I wakle, I pray the Lord my soul to take. Our father who art in heaven. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done. On earth as it is in heaven. For thine art the kingdom and the power, and the glory for ever and ever amen. Chilly willy, this aint no silly gilly. If you dont believe ask my sister little bitty. She lives in philly on top of a hilly and every night she eats a big bowl of chilly. Its true that your raps around town but you dont know your butt from a hole in the ground. A female dog is what you are. UFTO did not make you a star. Im a little tea pot, short and stout. Here is my handle, here is my spout. When I get all stemmed up than I shout. Tip me over and pour me out. To the left, to the left. To right, to the right. To front, to the front. TO the back, to the back. Come on now, dip baby dip. Toostie roll, come on let me see you roll. Take it down real low, all the way the flo.

Please note that this sample paper on gdfgsdg is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on gdfgsdg, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on gdfgsdg will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!