Consumerism with Barbara Ehrenreich and Henry David Thoreau

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Consumerism with Barbara Ehrenreich and Henry David Thoreau. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Consumerism with Barbara Ehrenreich and Henry David Thoreau paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Consumerism with Barbara Ehrenreich and Henry David Thoreau, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Consumerism with Barbara Ehrenreich and Henry David Thoreau paper at affordable prices with ! Plagued by its effects, Barbara Ehrenreich and Henry David Thoreau offer readers their insight on Consumerism. Consumerism is one of the most debatable theories that have valid arguments from all sides. Both Ehrenreich and Thoreau are anxious about the concept of Consumerism. In Walden, Thoreau condemns it, feeling that Consumerism controls ones life, with his emphasis on self-reliance; in Nickel and Dimed, Ehrenreich, conveyed how Consumerism created jobs that degraded people and caused them dissatisfaction.

Consumerism is the never-ending purchasing of new goods and services, without paying attention to their true need, durability, origin, and its harm to the environment. It is set into our minds by the immense advertising designed to attract people to follow certain trends. It hampers with the idea that instead of society working for an adequate supply of lifes necessities, it replaces it with a created artificial life, always wanting things, and have little or no concern for the true value of utility itings. Materialism is the end result of Consumerism. Not only does this have the power to attract people, Consumerism can control and influence your life. An increase in the number of jobs can also be a direct result of Consumerism. But these jobs that have been created for people who are widespread in poverty and dehumanization.

Thoreau is concerned that Consumerism has the power to control the lives of people, not allowing them to do what they would like to do. "Most men, even in this comparatively free country, through mere ignorance and mistake, are so occupied with the factitious cares and superfluously coarse labors of life that its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them." (Thoreau, ) Here, he argues that even in this free country, almost everyone is involved in a realm of a fake life and endure the rough labor to get it. Instead of their mistakes and ignorance, they should be searching for the "finer fruits" (). As people suppose that they need to own things this need forces them to devote all their time to labor. But he dives deeper into the concept of Consumerism by concentrating on labor as a necessity. He says, "But men labor under a mistake. The better part of the man is soon ploughed into the soil for compost. By a seeming fate, commonly called necessity, they are employed, as it says in an old book…" (). He sums up that everyones possessions require excess labor to purchase them, but also oppress them. Thoreau challenges his readers by asking, "It is an interesting question how far men would retain their relative rank if they were divested of their clothes." He then goes on to saying, "There is some of the same fitness in a mans building his own house that there is in their dwellings with their own hands, and provided food for themselves and families simply and honestly enough, the poetic family would be universally developed, as birds universally sing when they are so engaged?"(1) Even though, Thoreau does not directly mention Consumerism, it is clear that what he refers to as luxuries and necessities are directed towards that concept. "Some things are really necessities of life in some circles, the most helpless, and diseased, which in other are luxuries merely, and in others still are entirely unknown."(4) Consumerism being a rather large concept to understand, Barbara Ehrenreich had a slightly different opinion.

Barbara Ehrenreich is concerned that even though Consumerism creates jobs, good or bad, someone has to fill them. Most of the time these are the jobs that tend to be ones that are dirty, gory, and some even inhumane. As Consumerism becomes widespread, we tend to purchase goods and services at will. As this increases, more and more jobs are created, especially ones that require someone to cover the dirty work. Ehrenreich experiences this at first hand, "Maddy assigns me to do the kitchen floor. OK, except that Mrs. W. is in the kitchen, so I have to go down on my hands and knees practically at her feet."(Ehrenreich, 8) She then goes on to say, "But it is this primal posture of submission-and of what is ultimately anal accessibility- that seems to gratify the consumers of maid services."(84) She continues this by emphasizing her point, "Thats not your marble bleeding, I want to tell her, its the world wide working class-the people who quarried the marble, wove your Persian rugs until they went blind, harvested the apples in your lovely fall-themed dining room centerpiece, smelted the steel for the nails, drove the trucks, put up this building, and now bend and squat and sweat to clean it."(0) Ehrenreich also mentions that consumerism also causes dissatisfaction for people who are not fortunate to buy things that other people can. "Self-restraint becomes more of a challenge when the owner of a million-dollar condo…" (0) Readers can also see there is a sense of dissatisfaction during a discussion in the van, "Or well drive by a Dairy Queen and Holly will say, "They have great foursquares"-the local name for a sundae-"there, you know. With four kinds of sauce. You get chocolate, strawberry, butterscotch, and marshmallow and any kind of ice cream you want. I had one once and let it get a little melted and, oh my God," etc" (6).

Both Thoreau and Ehrenreich experienced first hand, the effects of Consumerism. For Thoreau it was self-reliance, being able to live his life and not be absorbed into a false one. For Ehrenreich it was her experience of poverty and dehumanization. Consumerism has its effects on everyone including these two. As Thoreau said it best, "What a man thinks of himself, that it is which determines, or rather indicates his fate."(Thoreau, 4)

Work Cited

Ehrenreich, Barbara. Nickel and Dimed. New York Henry Holt and Company, 001.

Thoreau, Henry David. Walden and Resistance to Civil Government. New York W.W. Norton & Company, 1

Please note that this sample paper on Consumerism with Barbara Ehrenreich and Henry David Thoreau is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Consumerism with Barbara Ehrenreich and Henry David Thoreau, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Consumerism with Barbara Ehrenreich and Henry David Thoreau will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Who won the Civil War

If you order your essay from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Who won the Civil War. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Who won the Civil War paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Who won the Civil War, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Who won the Civil War paper at affordable prices! Suggesting that the South won the War Between the States comes across as an appalling betrayal of American History as the American people know it. But do people truly know the nations history or just what they have been taught? Closely examining the goals of the Union versus the Confederacy people will come to find who really won the war.

In the Civil War or as in any other war, either group, in this case the Union and the Confederacy, fights to restore a common goal as far as each side is concerned. In the case of the War Between the States the South wanted to continue slavery as the slaves provided cheap labor for the large plantation operations prominent in the Southern states at this time. In conjunction with keeping slavery alive they also wanted the slaves to "know their place" in society. The North on the other hand had two separate goals in mind. First, was to preserve the Union. And second, was to abolish slavery. As a result of the war both the North and South remained victorious; each in only two of the four following areas; politically, socially, eco-nomically and morally.

Politically the South won the war. In the year 1865 the Freedmans Bureau was established in helping aid former slaves by providing them with food, fuel and clothing. The bureau also had acres of confiscated land that then could be leased to freed slaves or white Unionists. In addition, the 1th Amendment was drafted to further guarantee the end of slavery. Simplified it says that slavery, nor servitude, unless being punished for a crime, will exist in the U.S. The South, in an attempt to show their unwillingness for allowing and accepting the freedom of African Americans, passed "black codes" in South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, and other states. These codes were designed to restrict freedom and keep African Americans as close to slave status as possible, making Northern Republicans irate. In reaction to the use of "black codes" in the South, Congress passed two bills in 1866 to aid African Americans. The first bill was the Civil Rights Act and the other bill the 14th Amendment. The Civil Rights Act made it so that all persons born in the United States (except Indians) were national citizens and then listed rights these people were now entitled to thus African Americans were allowed full and equal benefit of all that the white men enjoyed. The 14th Amendment was passed due to the fact that President Johnson vetoed the Civil Rights Act. This Amendment made it clear that national citizenship included all former slaves due to the fact that they were either born or naturalized in the U.S. It also prohibited violating privileges of any citizen without due process. In this same year, 1866, the still prevalent Ku Klux Klan was founded as a Tennessee social club. Social they were not. They terrorized black and white Republicans in the various forms of threats, whippings, or even murdering individuals. These and similar acts were committed prior to the 1868 election to prevent black and white Republicans alike from voting in favor of Ulysses S. Grant of the Republican Party. To the KKKs dismay, Grant won the election despite the violence and terror they had caused. In 1868 seven former Confederate states had elected Republican governments, approved the revised constitutions, and ratified the 14th Amendment. Congress passed the 15th Amendment in 186 noting that the right to vote could not be denied due to race, color etc. Fearing that the amendment would not be ratified on account of discriminating loopholes Congress enhanced the chances of ratification by requiring the remaining Confederate states approve the 14th and 15th Amendment in order to be readmitted to the Union. Upon this final act Reconstruction was complete. However, despite each attempt by Northern Politicians and Congress to put an end to slavery in the U.S. Southern Politics were radically protected by the Ku Klux Klan. Though a withering organization, they are still a prevalent source of terror in America today.

Morally the North won the Civil War. In life, much like in war, the better things are going the higher the morale of each involved, thus keeping that group in the positive light. On the battle field the North won a vast majority of the larger battles and the South conquered smaller battles, thus making up the war. Most of the fighting also took place in the Southern states causing mass amounts of destruction to crops, homes, and complete towns as well as the families who lived there. Once the war was over the South trudged back home, at least to what was left of it, and the North triumphed, basking in the high spirits of the time. Economically the North prevailed as well. Due to the fact that most of the fighting had taken place in the Southern states, as stated above, much of the best agricultural land lay ruined. This included fields in northern Virginia, the Shenandoah Valley, and huge areas located in Mississippi, Tennessee, South Carolina and Georgia. Retreating Confederates had destroyed most of the cotton crops on purpose during the war to prevent its capture by federal troops. What remained of the cotton was confiscated by the Union troops as war contraband. Richmond, Atlanta and other towns and cities were left in complete ruins. The destruction the Civil War had caused left the South in a huge economic set back that would take them more than a generation to overcome. Now that the war was over what used to be considered a measure of prestige and wealth in the South, cotton and slaves, held less meaning. In 1870 the South only controlled 1% of the nations wealth, down 1% since 1860 when they controlled 5% of the nations wealth. As for the Northern states, they returned to their factories thus retaining their industrial power and economic status.

Socially the South triumphed in the post Civil War era. In conjunction with the aforementioned political happenings between the North and South, the South was still able to keep up slave like conditions years after the war ended. The freemen of the South were now being transformed from slaves to wage laborers by a man named General Benjamin F. Butler beginning in the year 186. This new policy of Butlers required that slaves remain on the plantation, where they would now receive very small wages for their work, while on a fixed schedule. Food and medical care was available for the old and or the sick. This system spanned throughout much of Louisiana and by 1864 there were more than 50,000 African Americans laboring daily on more than 1,500 plantations and they were all under contract. The contracts were required and supervised by the army and any wage laborer who did not sign one lost the ability of choosing where to work and would no longer receive pay. Instead the government relinquished the wages the laborer otherwise would have received at the years end. If one left before the one year mark from starting work was up they would not receive pay either. In other cases after the war, estate owners offered wages to the African Americans and then made them pay for food and a place to stay. These costs drove each who stayed on the plantation into debt, and they were not allowed to leave until the debt was paid off. Additionally, whites in the South banned together more than ever taking their "white pride" to a new level. At this point white skin had defined a social bond like no other making it so that even the poorest of the white men were superior to any black man no matter how prosperous or skilled he might be.

After reviewing the four areas; social, political, moral and economical both the North and South each equally achieved their goals set prior to the war that no winner is definitive. This further exemplifies that a victory must consist of more than one aspect than just "winning". In looking back at how shocking a suggestion the South having won the Civil War might have seemed at first, the question didnt change history, it has just changed the way you look at it.

Please note that this sample paper on Who won the Civil War is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Who won the Civil War, we are here to assist you. persuasive essay on Who won the Civil War will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

war on iraq

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on war on iraq. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality war on iraq paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in war on iraq, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your war on iraq paper at affordable prices! "If Saddam Hussein doesnt DISARM, it will be his FINAL MISTAKE!" George W. Bush. When looking at this quote one would understand the reason that this will be Saddam Husseins final Mistake. This is because the US will do everything in its power to get rid of him, which will most likely result to war. But to some people, the US is making a big mistake.

(PAUSE) Mrs. Goldstein and possible small pox recipients

For the next few minutes I will be speaking to you about why the United States should have held off war with Iraq until a later date.

Over the past couple of months, the US has stated their reasons for wanting to start war with Iraq. Some of the reasons were that ever since the Gulf War, the US has known that Saddam Hussein has NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL and CHEMICAL weapons that are capable of destroying major cities and even countries. Also Saddam has FAILED to cooperate with the United Nations in their weapons inspections. The United States is worried that if they dont put an end to Saddam Husseins empire, then eventually, Iraq will have powered many terrorist groups with lethal weapons as well having the money to continue to develop and create more harmful weapons that could one day, wipe out all of man kind.

Write a research paper on war on iraq

In addition, by researching I have found more significant reasons as to why the United States should go to war with Iraq at sometime. If they dont wipe out this generation of terrorists then the next generation willing more terrorists who hate the United States and their allies with a passion. There for in 10 when George Bush. Sr. was the President, they were allies with Saddam Hussein and they knew about what he did to the Curds with his Nerve Gas but they chose to keep it quiet. The reason for this was that they were both enemies of Iran. But later in his presidency, when George Bush wanted to start war with Iraq because of what they were capable of, all his advisors tried to convince him not to start war, but he did anyways. Unfortunately, the two main reasons that he went into war, he didnt accomplish; he failed to destroy Saddam Hussein and his weapons. So now George W. Bush is trying to clean up the mess that his Dad didnt take care of. But there are many obstacles that stand in their way.

The United States should have held off war at this moment because they need the backing of the United Nations. Also the US is going into Iraq to destroy the weapons of mass destruction but what could possibly happen is that Iraq would be forced into a situation where they would have to use their weapons as defence. The only dilemma is that their weapons cannot reach the United States so Iraq would use them on one of the USs allies that are close to them. Unfortunately, this could easily be ISRAEL. This poses a problem for the US because at this moment Israel does not want to get into a war, but a major attack like that woulding what is left of Israel into the war. Then the USs allies would start turning on the US because they dont want to be put into a dangerous position and before you know it, the whole world will be at each others throats.

As of March 1, 00, Thirty-Two countries were asked if they supported the United States in their bid for war on Iraq, if they wanted war but not yet or if they didnt want war at all. Majority of the countries voted for war but not yet. The only reasons that some countries didnt vote for war was because they wanted to protect themselves and they wanted to ensure that in the future they would have good relationships with all the countries that have important industries such as gas and oil. All the US had to do was hold off war until they had the support and approval of majority of their allies. Then they would have more ammo, more soldiers, more intelligence and most importantly UNIFICATION.

And now I will leave you with one final thought

Nerve Gas Capable of killing a town and defecting generations to come.

Small pox capable of killing a city and spreading through out the province or state.

Nuclear War Heads With one blast, it is capable of killing a state or a province

World War Three A terrible possibility and it is capable of turning the world against each other which will eventually lead to the demolition of the world as we know it.

If you knew a vicious dictator had you in the palm of his hand with all these possibilities to choose from, would you go to war, or wait for support?

Please note that this sample paper on war on iraq is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on war on iraq, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on war on iraq will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Defender of the Faith

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Defender of the Faith. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Defender of the Faith paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Defender of the Faith, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Defender of the Faith paper at affordable prices!

In Philip Roths, Defender of the Faith, there is a great intra personal struggle involving

the storys protagonist, Sergeant Nathan Marx. Throughout the story he is challenged in learning

how to live as not only a sergeant, but also a Jewish man, and a human being. In facing difficult

Online essay help on Defender of the Faith decisions, he realizes that these three identities are very difficult to distinguish. This conflict

becomes the recurring theme of the story. The reader is able to see the trouble Marx has in

confronting his faith, occupation, and humanity, and in doing this the readers attention is called

too just how hard this truly is in life.

The theme is greatly demonstrated in Marx relationship with the Jewish soldiers, Sheldon

Grossbart, Larry Fishbein, and Michael Halpern. The three soldiers recognize Marxs religion and

immediately take advantage of it. They begin by asking Marx for permission to attend the services

for Jews on Friday night, rather than participating in the G.I. party with the rest of the soldiers.

Their request seems sincere until their behavior at the service is described. For such hardcore

Jewish boys they were very irreverent, childish, and almost sacrilegious at the service. Their

motive was clearly to get out of the G.I. party, and not have to worry about what the other soldiers would say. They manipulated Marx in order to get what they wanted. The soldiers played upon the element of Marxs religion in order to get out of cleaning. This begins the series of questions that start invading Marxs mind. What comes first, being a sergeant, or being a Jew? Where can the line between the two be drawn?

The second instance is Grossbart writing a letter supposedly from his father to a congressman complaining about the military food. Grossbart insists that the food causes him to throw up, being that none of it is kosher and he is such an orthodox Jew. When Grossbart is questioned about the letter and his eating habits, he againings Marx in on his answer. Grossbart says, "I eat because I have to, sir. But Sergeant Marx will testify to the fact that I dont eat one mouthful more than I need in order to survive." After Grossbart says, this Marx denies that he has any knowledge of how Grossbart eats. Grossbart then answers saying, "But you heard the rabbi . . . He told us what to do, and I listened." By making clear and obvious remarks regarding their trip to the Jewish services he is again revealing the underlying theme. Is Marx not a Jew? Does Marx not know the pains of eating like this? Is Marx not a sergeant, someone well above a soldier like Grossbart in rank? Fortunately, Captain Barrett is able to make a legitimate reason to refuse Grossbarts request. Marx has been in the service for three years and two months and he has not once peeped about the food.

Grossbart continues to manipulate Marxs position when he asks for a favor, information regarding where the soldiers are going to be sent. Grossbart wants to know this information supposedly because his parents are severely worried, but it is obvious that he is just using his false kinship with Marx to acquire the answer to his question. Grossbart is successful in affecting Marx, but not in getting hold of any concrete answer as to where they are being sent. The personal ties of family that Grossbart speaks of really get to Marx. These images remind Marx that Grossbart was once a child, with a loving, protective family; just as Marx himself was. This conflict really questions the human side of Marx. Is it necessary to be such a stern sergeant at all times? When can human emotion actually be considered?

The theme is again presented during the absence of Captain Barrett. Grossbart attempts to take advantage of the Captains absence by asking Marx to give him a pass to leave for the weekend. Grossbart wants to go to St. Louis and have a Passover dinner with his relatives who live there. Marx is beginning to see through the faithless acts Grossbart is continually putting on. Just because he is Jewish, does not mean he deserves any special treatment. Yet, when Grossbart goes so far as to compare Marx to Hitler and states that he will go even without a pass, Marx gives in. Grossbart was clearly pushing Marxs limits yet again. When can a man stop being a man? When can a Jew stop being a Jew? When does a sergeant stop being a sergeant? These are the questions that flood Marxs mind. These are the questions in life that are greatly emotionally demanding.

The theme is so very clear in Marxs visible struggle. He is a soldier and a Jew, but above all he is a man. He has a conscience, which is precisely what causes him to continue allowing the soldiers and Grossbart to affect him. He is also a very sensitive person. He is sensitive to not only the needs of those around him, but to the validity of his actions and beliefs as a person. Marxs fight is just beginning, he has learned the importance of knowing when to be a soldier, when to be a Jew, and when to be a man. This is a difficult battle that all humans inevitably face.

Please note that this sample paper on Defender of the Faith is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Defender of the Faith, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Defender of the Faith will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Architecture articles

One of the most critical commencing problem for your most successfully written architecture article is its very own introduction, as its sets the style, tone, and influences the blog content articles for your remaining sections with the essay. Arguably it's the introduction with the architecture article that usually determines whether the intended audience for your architecture article will definitely pay adequate attention towards academic work standard, content, as well as the sort of the essay taken being a whole, etc. It is critical to know that a good introduction makes it simpler for your completed architecture article attain top marks. Even so, a poor or even an average introduction inside architecture article may well reduce the prospects of top marks greatly as the intended audience i.e. academic examiners or tutors could simply mentally switch off before reading the sleep of architecture article. Among another frequently asked essay topics architecture article is recognized being probably the most sought after. The matter is that architecture article is obligatory from the majority of art colleges and universities. Students are seeking the fascinating architecture article samples in order to write their assignments very best of all. To help the writing of short paragraphs, that are to the point and also well focused is really a sound strategy to plan out In conclusion, I believe that because every person must be born and die, have unique life experience throughout his life, and have very different lifestyles, people are both standardized and unique in their own unique ways.

Please note that this sample paper on Standard In Unique Ways is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Standard In Unique Ways, we are here to assist you. persuasive essay on Standard In Unique Ways will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

Proctor - Right Decision

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Proctor - Right Decision. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Proctor - Right Decision paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Proctor - Right Decision, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Proctor - Right Decision paper at affordable prices! John Proctor made the right decision when he chose to have himself hung. He was given the option of signing a false confession to save himself. John would not sign the document, because he felt it was morally wrong to lie to save himself, even if death is the punishment. Proctor, at first, signed the document but because of his integrity, he was unable to. Proctor made his decision based on personal beliefs on what he thought was right and is defined as a martyr because of this.

Proctor, having lived with guilt over his adultery for a long time, has a change of heart towards the end of the play. His reasons for keeping his adultery with Abigail a secret, were because he feared what people would think of him. He had changed because at the end of the play, he had not cared about public opinion of his name, but he cared about the integrity of his name. Proctor is the tragic hero, he died because he did not want to dishonor other innocent people sentenced to death. In all plays, movies, books, etc. the man who dies for what is right is the hero, and John Proctor is that man in this play.

Silverman

Online essay help on Proctor - Right Decision

Proctors final decision was the best choice he could possibly make. When he died, he forgot about all of his previous sins (the affair with Abigail Williams), and is able to die with a clear conscience. Proctor had pride and would not sell his name to some man for something he knew was wrong. Proctors wife was quoted as saying "He have his goodness now. God Forbid I take it from him," in response to when she was asked to stop her husband from taking his life. John made his decision because it was how he believed he would be able to get into heaven, there is not a better nor more noble reason to do something, than to do it because it is right.

John Proctor is the most noble character in this play, he was willing to die honorably, and and was willing to die as "testimony to the truth." As he died, he began to recite a prayer, to show that he knew what he was doing was right, and that his spirit and his name can not be shattered. It is not possible to disagree with Johns decision, because doing that is asking him to lie, ruin his good name, lose self respect, and dishonor the others who fought to death, to defend the truth.

Please note that this sample paper on Proctor - Right Decision is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Proctor - Right Decision, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Proctor - Right Decision will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!