A Rent-A-Center's Survival Story

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on A Rent-A-Center's Survival Story. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality A Rent-A-Center's Survival Story paper right on time. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in A Rent-A-Center's Survival Story, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your A Rent-A-Center's Survival Story paper at affordable prices! A Rent-A-Centers Survival Story by Carolyn

Waugh-Tandy

There are several states where rent to own

contracts are illegal. In those states they use the

Purchase your paper on A Rent-A-Center's Survival Story term rental agreement contract. I was totally

knowledgeable of this when I walked into East

Stroudsburg, PA Rent-A-Center. Unfortunately I gave

into my deep desires and over one month signed four

rent to own contracts. No credit check required and

you could purchase optional liability insurance- what

more could I ask? This all transpired in about October

of 2000. I am only now trying to make some sense out

of the whole humiliating experience.

It became burdensome making our $139.00 weekly

payments. The company was advertising in the local

newspaper for Account Managers, Assistant Store

Managers, and Store Managers. The company would be

opening another store in Bethlehem, PA. I went in to

make my weekly payment. The District Manager was

there. I was introduced to Mr. Louis Hall as an

interested candidate qualified to apply for the

position of Account Manager. I expressed a desire to

blend in with the all male less than 40 group. He was

extremely charming and encouraged me to fill out an

application. The company ran two adds for employment

that year; one in September and one in December. I

went to the newspaper later on and got photocopies ofthe ads.

Back to my story, I made those payments for eight

months. When I missed a payment we were charged $5.00

per item late charge, plus the next weeks payment. Our

bill was then $298.00! Although all the contracts

stated weekly as well as bi monthly bill per item, I

opted to pay weekly. Yes if I made all my weekly

payments I would be paying roughly $1092.31 more. I

did not remember signing anything declaring I had to

make weekly payments. I guess I wanted to pay weekly

so I would never fall behind far enough for them to

repossess our things. I really had another thing

coming.

Truthfully I do not know how I stayed a customer

so long. They scratched the night tables- both had

matching gouges. The deliverymen did this loading the

truck toing them. The computer never worked

correctly. The "E" support was non operational and the

fax program was not working. The printer did not print

most of the time either. Iought the whole thing

back to the store and they sent it out to be fixed. In

the mean time I was issued an identical printer that

worked 100%. When my printer was returned fixed, I

needed to replace both ink cartridges and it was a

long time before I was able to use it. Yes all the

while I was making my payments.

It finally happened on August 25, 2001. The store

reposed everything for non-payment of $298.00. I

called the store that afternoon and talked directly to

Mr. Hall. I was very apologetic over the situation. I

also reminded him of all the resumes I had left with

the Store Manager. I left five resumes and filled out

two employment applications; one in person and one on

line. He was very rude and auptly said there were no

employment positions available with in any of the

company stores. He also said any "holes in the

schedule would be filled by other employees". I was

mortified over the repossessing of the four items, but

now I was totally humiliated over his treatment of me.

The truck came at 6:00pm on Saturday night and

everyone in my neighborhood was outside enjoying the

summer weather. The deliverymen removed the washer and

dryer, bedroom set, computer and printer, and the

45-inch big screen television. The laundry room had a

funny smell but I thought it was just my imagination.

The next day I went in there to clean up all the lint

on the floor. The walls were covered in black mold-

from about where the washing machine was standing all

the way down to the floor. I began cleaning the walls

with Clorox bleach in a spray bottle. I scrubbed the

walls until the plasterboard paper was coming off. I

was so up set because our landlord was not going to

renew our lease as it was. (I cannot blame him the

repossession made us a poor credit risk). I was scared

he would take legal action and make us pay for the

damages!

With in one or two days of cleaning the walls I

became terribly sick with an upper respiratory ailment

that required treatment at the local hospital on

September 13, 2001. I hadonchial pneumonia; at

about the same time my youngest son got an earache,

also requiring antibiotics. I still believe the mold

made us sick. I sued the store for $8,000.00 at the

local magistrates office. I felt the stores

responsibilities fell short. If the deliverymen would

have hooked up the appliances correctly and cleaned up

the area before leaving we would not have had the

black mold. I also felt their contracts were devised

to deliberately deceive people how much more they

would pay by paying weekly. The local Judge disagreed

and we lost.

I contacted the Pennsylvania Human Relations

Commission regarding the companys hiring practices.

They have been very helpful. I filed two separate

complaints against the Rent-A-Center Company. The

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has a current

case pending a settlement. I was so elated to read in

their press release dated March 8, 2002. I went

directly back to the Store Manager and reapplied for a

third time. This time I was allowed to take two

separate pre-employment tests. I was so happy; I took

my time and did my best. These tests were authorized

through the E.E.O.C. Two days past and I went to the

store to ask how did I do? I had left resume number

six but was not interviewed at the time of the test. I

was told I had failed the visual by one question. I

was not allowed to review either test at that time.

The Store Manager was extremely cordial and courteous

but no interview. I filed with PA. H. R. C. I was so

angry they were a big help. I am a part of the current

court litigations, from my first complaint dating back

to October 2000. I also had an appointment to view my

test results with a case manager. I went but I am not

still satisfied.

I am a white female age 47; I have slight vision

impairment. I have a lazy eye, since birth. I read

much slower than most. I was given a timed test for 50

questions to compare same or different. I could only

finish 46 of which I got 39 correct. The case manager

explained the significance of the tests. She also was

supportive towards my position- I will get some of the

initial settlement, she said. I did above the required

score on the customer service section and I have

excellent business skills. I signed the with drawl

forms to with draw my complaint, the one from March

2002. I guess we won the war but lost the battle- is

how I feel.

I have been researching every aspect of the

Rent-A-Center Corporation on the Internet. I have

found out some startling facts regarding the company.

The company was sued for non-payment of overtime to

Assistant Managers and Store Managers. The company was

also liable for invasive testing of employees. The

employees were requested to submit to 500 questions

mostly not related to their actual job skills or

abilities to function on a business level. The company

made an agreement to pay $2 million for the people who

took the test. This was in a California court. They

agreed to pay $2,000.00 to each employee who took the

test and failed it. They also agreed to pay $1250.00

to each employee who passed, because of the

invasiveness of the questions. The company claimed the

purpose of the tests were to devise a profile of each

employee according to the deviation of the answers to

the true and false questions. The court ruled the

questions were not pertaining to their abilities to

perform the job functions.

As I stated earlier, I am a 47 years old. I have

lived through a life experience similar to this

before. Nothing they could say to me would change my

mind; then or now. I never began my adult working

career wanting to become a martyr. Although I always

have had similar views as Womens Rights Organizations

I chose not to belong to any. I did not want to become

stigmatized by belonging to them. I am proud to say in

1974 I was one of the first female employees at the

New York Daily News. The industry did not sign a

consent decree until 1979. I was invited back to work

for the company. I was very naïve at the tender age of

24. The women were overwhelmingly applying to

"shape-up" with the men. They came in with their

manicures and platform sandals wanting to be hired

because of their gender.

I became totally disillusioned on why I had

started there to begin with. I saw women working in

crews of four and five manning entire presses. It was

very exciting. I did feel vindicated. Except when I

saw less qualified females, wining discrimination,

their refusal to do equal work use to grade on my

nerves. I have often compared the similarities between

the two companies. Many years ago I went to "shape-up"

at the New York Times. I was the only one not hired on

the floor- they had one more job left. The janitor was

given the job and it was held until he finished his

first job. I was asked if I wanted to "fool around in

the office with the Bosses". I left quietly. In my

current position I have been forced to watch

inexperienced and improperly trained delivery people

ruin my home and make my son and I sick. I have also

witnessed about five different men, under 40 get hired

and trained and watched them get promotions. The one

thing I have learned is I need to understand why these

men have acted this way to me.

After reading the news article on

Rent-A-Centers invasive employee testing policy, I

have compassion for the Store Manager at the East

Stroudsburg store. I do not know if the companyoke

any laws here in Pennsylvania, or even if the

employees here in Pennsylvania received any of the

settlement money. Just the reality of this helps me to

have compassion. I have a stronger understanding for

the human condition thatought about his actions.

The rest I will leave to the courts to figure out. I

hope justices prevail in this no win situation.

Please note that this sample paper on A Rent-A-Center's Survival Story is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on A Rent-A-Center's Survival Story, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on A Rent-A-Center's Survival Story will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!